Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for September, 2010

So this just came to me today, as I was playing piano.

I realized that between the renaissance and about 1900, artists, musicians, and poets were instinctually worshipped as though they were demigods, in the same way that scientists were (in fact, often moreso).

This is primarily because, these artists were seen as revealing the mind of God, just like the scientists.

Let me explain:  between 1500 and 1900, most people in the West believed that the Christian god had created the universe, and made it according to a definite and logical set of laws, which however remained to be discovered by humanity.  Many believed after 1500 that it was the purpose of mankind to discover these laws – this would make him more reasonable, more perfected, and he could thereby overcome some of the ill-effects of the fall.  Pico even said that by discovering the laws of god, we became gods ourselves – and many secretly agreed with him, even if it was blasphemous to say it outright.

So, the point is, that scientists, such as Galileo, Newton, the inventors of the telescope and microscope, etc., were seen as ‘revealing the mind of god.”  I.e., God was one with the universe – he created it, he was it, he was in it, all around it, but he was also the universe itself.  So the idea was that if you discover the laws of nature, i.e., the laws of physics, you are discovering the laws of god – even, perhaps, how his mind itself works.

And, at the same time, it was known that musicians were discovering the laws of harmony, which were considered to be related to the “music of the spheres,” i.e., the mathematics which made gravity and the laws of physics work – or rather which ordered them, and explained them, and were the building blocks of them.  So, the laws of music, the laws of harmony, of major and minor scales, of thirds, fifths, and the rest, were considered to be the same laws that were written into the code of the universe – and this is why some notes are inherently pleasing (e.g., a fifth), while others are inherently jarring (i.e., a half step, or a series of notes out of scale). (more…)

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

So, After thinking about it a bit more, I’ve realized that I really have no idea what will happen if I change the site name here, and besides, all of this was written under the heading “The Platonist.” Thus, we’ll keep it “The Platonist,” with the understanding that “The Idealist” might be a future incarnation – perhaps something bigger and better. You’ll notice of late, that there have been fewer posts, and that is because I’ve been very busy on my book and some supporting material, meaning that I’ve been too braindead to type for The Platonist–any time I could use typing here, I’ve been opening my word files for my other things instead. So it’s good – I’ve been very productive lately, just not in this forum. The hope is, that the book and accompanying articles will help to further my academic position, and make it so that I can spend more time writing on these issues, but hopefully in an even more effective format, so that I can help to bring some of these ideas not merely to a web forum, but to some of the people who are really in a position to change things for the better – if only the issues we discuss here were brought more keenly into focus for them. So, wish me luck, and I’ll keep you posted. Cheerio, – trivium.

Read Full Post »